California's statewide court bureaucracy is "dysfunctional" and should be slashed, reorganized and relocated to cheaper headquarters to save millions of dollars per year, an 11-judge committee found in a report released over the weekend.

Siding with increasingly vocal critics within the judiciary, the 298-page report blasts the state Administrative Office of the Courts for its unchecked growth and accumulation of power at a time when California's courts are coping with Gov. Jerry Brown's plan to cut the judiciary's budget by $544 million this coming year.

The report cites many examples of bureaucratic bloat, from a "top heavy" and "unwieldy" management structure to unnecessary and overstaffed programs. The report targeted numerous divisions, including the 75-member legal team, which has a staff attorney who is allowed to telecommute from Switzerland.

With a slew of recommendations, the committee took particular aim at the size of the AOC staff, as well as what it considered a disproportionate number of employees earning more than $100,000 a year. The court bureaucracy grew from about 430 employees in 2002 to more than 1,100 last year, with hundreds of them having six-figure salaries.

The committee suggested the court bureaucracy, which amounted to about $125 million of the judiciary's budget of more than $3 billion, could be cut to fewer than 700 employees. And it called for the agency's headquarters to be moved from nearly $11

million-per-year digs in San Francisco to cheaper, smaller space in Sacramento.

"The organization needs to be right-sized," the report said.

In response to mounting criticism of the AOC in recent years, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye in March 2011 appointed the committee to examine the agency's operations and costs. In a brief session with reporters Tuesday, the chief justice said the state Judicial Council, which oversees the agency and courts, will now consider the recommendations.

Cantil-Sakauye stressed that she demanded the report to respond to concerns of judges and legislators. And she called the report a "snapshot in time," saying AOC staffers were heavily involved in assembling the information and provided "most of the hard criticisms."

The chief justice also defended her decision to release the report on Friday night of Memorial Day weekend, a move that prompted one group of judges to say she was trying to "minimize the impact of negative press coverage."

"That report was released as soon as I got it," she said.

The Alliance of California Judges, a group established three years ago in large part to call for dismantling the AOC, called the report an "indictment" of an agency "broken at its very core."

The group's leaders praised most of the report's findings, although they said the agency should be cut far more than the report suggested.

Howard Mintz covers legal affairs. Contact him at 408-286-0236 or follow him at Twitter.com/hmintz.